Week 1 · AoL · Total 20 marks
CIA Triad & Case Study
Benchmark: 11.4.2.1 Apply the CIA triad
Task brief
Classify 6 scenarios against CIA, define 4 key terms, and apply CIA to a real cyber incident.
Submission checklist
- Completed 3-task worksheet
- Due: end of Week 1
Marking criteria
CIA classification
6 marks
Evidence from:Wk 1 · Task 1 — Classify against CIA
Excellent (5–6)
6/6 correct with clear reasons.
Proficient (4)
5/6 correct.
Developing (2–3)
3–4 correct.
Emerging (0–1)
≤2 correct.
Key-term accuracy
4 marks
Evidence from:Wk 1 · Task 2 — 4 key definitions
Excellent (4)
All 4 defined in own words with examples.
Proficient (3)
3 defined clearly.
Developing (2)
2 defined; some confusion.
Emerging (0–1)
Copied or missing.
Case-study application
10 marks
Evidence from:Wk 1 · Task 3 — Case study response
Excellent (8–10)
Links ≥2 pillars, correct control, well written.
Proficient (6–7)
Links 2 pillars, control reasonable.
Developing (3–5)
Links 1 pillar.
Emerging (0–2)
Off-topic.
Grading scale
| Band | Range | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 80–100% | Exceeds all criteria; can teach others. |
| Proficient | 65–79% | Meets all criteria consistently. |
| Developing | 50–64% | Meets most criteria; some support needed. |
| Emerging | 0–49% | Significant gaps; needs re-teaching. |
Teacher summary
Student / Group:
Total awarded:
/ 20
Band:
Comment: